Thursday, September 27, 2007

Carbon Offsets: a green red herring

Do you know what a carbon offset ACTUALLY is? Check out this great interview with Peter Schweizer arguing that carbon offsets are simply a way for people with money to outsource their moral obligation to be more green.

See, here's the thing: global warming is a symptom of more than carbon overuse. Its part of a larger habit of consumption that is killing us. When will we get it? All the carbon offsets in the world won't help us if we continue to need more house, more car, new clothes, new furniture, better bargains, more stuff. Newer. More. Both antithesis to reduce, reuse, recycle, conserve.

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Do You Need Another Reason to Buy American?

Toxic toys. Disintegrating tires. Poisoned toothpaste, pet food, and human food. Deadly baby formula. These are just the newest reasons not to buy MADE IN CHINA. But what about the other reasons? They've been there all along.

Outsourcing of American jobs. Loss of livable wages. Profit-at-any-cost corporations. Walmartification and the death of local business. Lack of quality control (um, YEAH). If you think all of those things aren't inextricably tied to MADE IN CHINA then, baby, you're just kidding yourself.

Did you need the FDA to tell you that buying from China was putting savings above safety, quality and even your health? Your family's health? You didn't, really. You knew it. Cheap food, cheap toys, cheap tablecloths are all products of corner-cutting, and China is at the top of that heap. Add to that the environmental impact of all those American dollars being sent to companies who demonstrate their value in their willingness to pollute with impunity.

Look through your house at everything that is Made in China and think about all the ways you're putting your health and the health of your family in China's hands. And ask yourself, "Did I sell my soul for WalMart's low prices?" Always.

Thursday, June 14, 2007

Quotable Marquez:

“She discovered with great delight that one does not love one's children just because they are one's children but because of the friendship formed while raising them.”

SUV Conquers Moms

These are the moms I know: educated and/or intelligent, studious with regard to parenting issues, eager consumers of organic foods & products, concerned with our environmental legacy, and fastidious with regard to child safety issues. Well, fastidious to a point.

You see, the mom's I know, by and large, show their Achilles heel when it comes to Car Cool. These moms cannot bear the thought of driving or being seen in a minivan. And, when it came time for many of us to consider having a second child, the truth was revealed: these otherwise smart, eco-conscious moms would be upgrading to an SUV.

It is, I think, the ultimate triumph of the Detroit automakers. These women are convinced that a minivan just plain sucks. Yeah, that's right. THIS minivan. This marvel of parent/child-oriented design. About the only thing that could make this car more perfect for families would be if you made it a hybrid. Oh - wait. There you go.

Not to mention that these loving mommies are more likely to hurt themselves, their children or other people's children in their SUVs.

Way to go, Detroit. You won. And it makes me scared behind the wheel of my Subaru.

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

The Best Women

Zadie Smith
Angelina Jolie
Bishop Katherine Jefferts Schori
Eleanor Roosevelt

Purpose: To list the women worth listing, in no particular order, updated randomly.
Qualities: Looking for, among other things, grace, intelligence, authenticity, passion, thoughtful expression, concern for something outside the self.
Nominations: Please.

Friday, February 02, 2007

Open Letter to the Gabfest on Why Accountability Matters

You know, I’m normally the first person in my social circle to stand up for the print press and say that they still serve the public, but today’s Gabfest really undermined that belief. It was so simple: John asked David and Emily whether the Libby trial mattered.

Clearly it doesn’t matter to you all. Your interest is in whether this trial would publicly hurt the credibility of this administration (which you assert is already hurt) or whether the trial would cause this administration to get its comeuppance (which, you assert, they actually got in the last election). It seems to me your concerns are completely cynical and extraordinarily out of touch with the concerns of the people you are supposed to serve as journalists.

As one of the ordinary people, let me tell you why this trial matters. It isn’t about credibility and it isn’t about beltway comeuppance. It is about accountability. If Scooter Libby or anyone else in this administration broke the law, they need to be accountable not to the press but to the law and, hence, the people. It is infuriating enough for ordinary people to see how cynically our leaders manipulated the press in order to further their own agenda. But then to hear you all say that, because we all now know about it, it no longer matters is incredibly disappointing.

Get your heads around this: simply saying “yes, I broke the law” or “yes, I betrayed my oath” doesn’t absolve a person of wrongdoing. Saying “I’m responsible” doesn’t mean you’re taking responsibility. There must be action. There must be restitution. And in some cases there must be trials and there must be sentences. There must be consequences when our leaders commit wrongs. Forgetting that is the ultimate cynical act.

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Here's to the Ladies from Texas

A quick word about the passing of spitfire Molly Ivins and, for that matter, that wonderful Ann Richards.

When do the passing of a politician and a journalist make your heart ache? When they are two of the most deliciously outspoken women you've ever known or heard of. At 31, I've grown up in what we call the "post-feminist" generation where excellence and success are assumed to be within our reach. We're aware of the wide trail we're blazing, and with that awareness sometimes comes this need to be the best, the most accomplished, the most correct. And in that process perhaps we lose a little of our rage, our fire, our Voice.

Not so Ms. Ivins or Ms. Richards. Its gotta be the Texan within them. I know some other outspoken Texas women who are delightfully opinionated. They say what's on their minds like no others, and in that way they were the most refreshing kind of Liberals: the unapologetic and uncompromising kind.

Witty, clever, honest, and sharp as nails, a bit of Molly and of Ann will live on in my heart and in my mind and, god willing, in my pen. Forget the toast. Tonight, a good stiff shot of bourbon will be had in their honors. Well done, Ladies. Well done.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

the facade of the single woman

With the news that there are now more single women than married in the US, there comes the obligatory media celebration and examination of this newly discovered creature, the majority single woman. And there’s the inevitable framing of “singledom” - "since it is now the status quo, it must be great". But the ensuing conversation, as always, is hollow and pointless: a rapid fire discussion about why its better to not be married at all than to enter into a bad relationship.

Now I’m not anti-single girls. I think the new numbers suggest a brilliant and empowering new place for modern women. They suggest that marriage is not “it” – its not the goal or the end-all-be-all. Marriage is simply one of many options that can make up a fascinating and fulfilling life for modern women. But when the Today Show invites the Bachelorette on to talk about how being single until she finds the right man, no matter how long it takes, is OK, I take issue.

What the Bachelorette and the Today Show are saying, in essence, is that its OK to wait until you’re older to find Mr. Right. And that is wrong. It still places marriage at the center of a woman’s life and avoids talking about WHY we should get married in the first place. Here’s a better question: “What makes Mr. Right right?”

First, lets agree that marriage is not necessary. It is ceremony and a shorthand description. Without it, many couples have gone on to lead committed lives and/or build successful families. Marriage begins with a symbolic ceremony that some see as a defining symbol – a statement – and that’s great, too.

But what makes a marriage work is something we do not seem to be ready to discuss. We’ll talk about how to keep “date night” going and improve sex within the marriage, but when we talk about why the single girl should stop being single, we drape the conversation in “checklists” and ephemera, and are afraid to say what needs to be said: lasting, successful marriage is series of compromises made by two imperfect people who choose to build a life together.

Building a life together is about growing together, changing together. Mr. Right today may not be exactly Mr. Right in the next decade. So what do you do then? What happens when he’s no longer the perfect match? So the marriage is now Less-Than-Ideal. What next?

Obviously the answer to that question is a personal one, but at least it’s a question that makes you stop and think.